Inclusion at universities: Psychometric properties of an inclusive management scale as perceived by students

dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Concepcion
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Las Americas - Chile
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad Santo Tomas
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad San Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorSolís-Grant, Maria Jose
dc.contributor.authorEspinoza-Parçet, Camila
dc.contributor.authorSepulveda-Carrasco, Cristobál
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Villalobos, Cristhian
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Nunez, Ivan
dc.contributor.authorPincheira-Martinez, Cristian
dc.contributor.authorGomez-Varela, Juan Pablo
dc.contributor.authorAranguiz-Ibarra, Daniela
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T20:23:44Z
dc.date.available2022-02-22T20:23:44Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-07
dc.description.abstractIntroduction During the last century, the inclusion of all kinds of diversity became a social imperative in all social spaces but above all in some institutions such as the educational ones. Among these, inclusion has been least studied in the tertiary education organizations. This communication proposes and evaluates the psychometric properties of a new instrument, named Inclusive Management in Tertiary Institutions Scale (IMTIS), to assess inclusive management in universities. Method The researchers used a quantitative research model through survey. We based on the Index for Inclusion to design the IMTIS. We first submitted it to the assessment of experts. Then we applied the resulting version in an online survey including a sample of 1557 students from two universities and 121 different undergraduate careers. A panel of experts judged the content validity of the instrument. Participants answered the IMTIS after informed consent. We used confirmatory factor analysis to assess the construct validity of the instrument. We also evaluated the reliability of the measurements. Results From a kit of 33 originally proposed items, we obtained a version of 22 items with CVR between 0.60 and 1.00, and a IVC = 0.78. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the six-factor solution had a better adjustment than the one and three factors solutions (RMSEA = 0.059; CFI = 0.947; TLI = 0.937). The McDonald ω coefficients were between 0.864 and 0.922. Conclusion The results deliver evidence that supports the validity and reliability of the IMTIS measurements to carry out research and diagnosis of inclusive management in higher education institutions.
dc.description.sponsorshipUCO [1895]; This research was funded by UCO 1895 project. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE, 17(1 January), e0262011. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262011
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262011
dc.identifier.isbnpp. 39-59
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8467-5878
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7655-4881
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2049-5974
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6062-9674
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8950-2191
dc.identifier.pmid34995314
dc.identifier.researcheridABA-7736-2020
dc.identifier.rorhttps://ror.org/0460jpj73
dc.identifier.rorhttps://ror.org/0166e9x11
dc.identifier.rorhttps://ror.org/02vbtzd72
dc.identifier.rorhttps://ror.org/04jrwm652
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid57218351498
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid57218351270
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid57407499400
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid23095561400
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid57087203700
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid57407392500
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid57408044800
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid57407933700
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.udla.cl/handle/udla/961
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.relation.fundingUniversity of California Observatories, UCO, (1895)
dc.relation.fundingUniversity of California Observatories, UCO
dc.relation.fundingUCO [1895]
dc.relation.isindexedbyWeb of Science
dc.relation.issn1932-6203
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourcePLOS ONE
dc.source.urihttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0262011
dc.subjectHIGHER-EDUCATION
dc.subjectDISABLED STUDENTS
dc.subjectDEMANDS
dc.subject.lcshInclusive education
dc.titleInclusion at universities: Psychometric properties of an inclusive management scale as perceived by students
dc.title.alternativeInclusion at universities: Psychometric properties of an inclusive management scale as perceived by students.
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.udla.catalogadorCBM
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.titlePLOS ONE
oaire.citation.volume17
udla.curacion.controljmvg
udla.odsODS 4: Educación de calidad
udla.oecd.area5 Ciencias Sociales

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Solis 2022 Inclusion-at-universities-Psychometric-properties-of-an-inclusive-management-scale-as-perceived-by-studentsPLoS-ONE.pdf
Size:
834.73 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections