Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorAutorSolis-Grant, María José
dc.contributor.authorAutorEspinoza-Parcet, Camila
dc.contributor.authorAutorSepúlveda-Carrasco, Cristóbal
dc.contributor.authorAutorPérez-Villalobos, Cristhian
dc.contributor.authorAutorRodríguez-Núñez, Iván
dc.contributor.authorAutorPincheira-Martínez, Cristian
dc.contributor.authorAutorGómez-Varela, Juan Pablo
dc.contributor.authorAutorAránguiz-Ibarra, Daniela
dc.contributor.otherCarreraFacultad de educaciónes
dc.date.accessionedFecha ingreso2022-02-22T20:23:44Z
dc.date.availableFecha disponible2022-02-22T20:23:44Z
dc.date.issuedFecha publicación2022
dc.identifier.citationReferencia BibliográficaPLoS ONE 17(1), 18 p.
dc.identifier.issnISSN1932-6203
dc.identifier.uriURLhttp://repositorio.udla.cl/xmlui/handle/udla/961
dc.identifier.uriURLhttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0262011
dc.description.abstractResumenIntroduction During the last century, the inclusion of all kinds of diversity became a social imperative in all social spaces but above all in some institutions such as the educational ones. Among these, inclusion has been least studied in the tertiary education organizations. This communication proposes and evaluates the psychometric properties of a new instrument, named Inclusive Management in Tertiary Institutions Scale (IMTIS), to assess inclusive management in universities. Method The researchers used a quantitative research model through survey. We based on the Index for Inclusion to design the IMTIS. We first submitted it to the assessment of experts. Then we applied the resulting version in an online survey including a sample of 1557 stu- dents from two universities and 121 different undergraduate careers. A panel of experts judged the content validity of the instrument. Participants answered the IMTIS after informed consent. We used confirmatory factor analysis to assess the construct validity of the instru- ment. We also evaluated the reliability of the measurements. Results From a kit of 33 originally proposed items, we obtained a version of 22 items with CVR between 0.60 and 1.00, and a IVC = 0.78. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the six-factor solution had a better adjustment than the one and three factors solutions (RMSEA = 0.059; CFI = 0.947; TLI = 0.937). The McDonald ω coefficients were between 0.864 and 0.922. Conclusion The results deliver evidence that supports the validity and reliability of the IMTIS measure- ments to carry out research and diagnosis of inclusive management in higher education institutions.es
dc.format.extentdc.format.extent18 páginas
dc.format.extentdc.format.extent834.7Kb
dc.format.mimetypedc.format.mimetypePDF
dc.language.isoLenguaje ISOen
dc.publisherEditorPublic Library of Science
dc.sourceFuentesPLoS ONE
dc.subject.lcshdc.subject.lcshInclusive education
dc.titleTítuloInclusion at universities: Psychometric properties of an inclusive management scale as perceived by studentses
dc.typeTipo de DocumentoArtículoes
dc.udla.catalogadordc.udla.catalogadorCBM
dc.udla.indexdc.udla.indexSCOPUS
dc.identifier.doidc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0262011
dc.udla.privacidaddc.udla.privacidadDocumento públicoes


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem