Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAuthorVásquez Bonilla, Aldo
dc.contributor.authorAuthorYáñez Sepúlveda, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorAuthorGómez Carmona, Carlos D.
dc.contributor.authorAuthorOlcina, Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorAuthorOlivares Arancibia, Jorge Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorAuthorRojas Valverde, Daniel
dc.contributor.otherCareerPedagogia en educacion Fisicaes
dc.date.accessionedDate Accessioned2025-04-12T22:12:23Z
dc.date.availableDate Available2025-04-12T22:12:23Z
dc.date.issuedDate Issued2024
dc.identifier.citationReferencia BibliográficaSports, 12(4), 15 p.es
dc.identifier.issnISSN2075-4663
dc.identifier.uriURIhttp://repositorio.udla.cl/xmlui/handle/udla/1694
dc.description.abstractAbstractThe study aimed to calculate training intensity and load using muscle oxygen saturation (SmO2) during two differentiated physical tasks. 29 university athletes participated in a 40-m Maximal Shuttle Run Test (MST, 10 × 40-m with 30 s recovery between sprints) and a 3000-m time trial run. Distance and time were used to calculate external load (EL). Internal load indicators were calculated based on percentage of maximum heart rate (%HRMAX) and SmO2 variables: muscle oxygen extraction (∇%SmO2) and the cardio-muscle oxygen index (CMOI) was also provided by relating ∇%SmO2 ÷ %HRMAX, and the training load were calculated as the product of speed (m/min × IL) and the efficiency index [Effindex (m/min ÷ IL)]. A student t test was applied based on Bayesian factor analysis. As expected, EL differed in the 40-m MST (331 ± 22.8) vs. 3000-m trials (222 ± 56.8) [BF10 = 6.25e+6; p = <0.001]. Likewise, IL showed higher values in 40-m MST (39.20 ± 15.44) vs. 3000-m (30.51 ± 8.67) in CMOI: [BF10 = 1.70; p = 0.039]. Training load was greater in 40-m MST (85.77 ± 27.40) vs. 3000-m (15.55 ± 6.77) [(m/min × ∇%SmO2): BF10 = 12.5; p = 0.003] and 40-m MST (129.27 ± 49.44) vs. 3000-m (70.63 ± 32.98) [(m/min × CMOI): BF10 = 169.6; p = <0.001]. Also, the Effindex was higher in 40-m MST (10.19 ± 4.17) vs. 3000-m (6.06 ± 2.21) [(m/min × ∇%SmO2): BF10 = 137.03; p = <0.001] and 40-m MST (9.69 ± 4.11) vs. 3000-m (7.55 ± 1.87) [(m/min × CMOI): BF10 = 1.86; p = 0.035]. This study demonstrates calculations of training intensity and load based on SmO2 as an internal load indicator along with speed as an external load indicator during two differentiated exercises.es
dc.language.isoLanguage ISOenes
dc.publisherPublisherMDPIes
dc.subjectSubjectExercise efficiencyes
dc.subjectSubjectExercise physiology and physical performancees
dc.subjectSubjectMuscle oxygenationes
dc.subjectSubjectTraining loades
dc.titleTitleCalculating load and intensity using muscle oxygen saturation dataes
dc.typeDocument TypeArtículoes
dc.identifier.doidc.identifier.doi10.3390/sports12040113
dc.udla.privacidaddc.udla.privacidadDocumento públicoes


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record