Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorAutorGutiérrez-Espinoza, Héctor.
dc.contributor.authorAutorAraya-Quintanilla, Felipe.
dc.contributor.authorAutorOlguín-Huerta, Cristian.
dc.contributor.authorAutorValenzuela-Fuenzalida, Juan.
dc.contributor.authorAutorGutiérrez-Monclus, Rodrigo.
dc.contributor.authorAutorMoncada-Ramírez, Victoria.
dc.date.accessionedFecha ingreso2024-09-03T19:21:33Z
dc.date.availableFecha disponible2024-09-03T19:21:33Z
dc.date.issuedFecha publicación2022
dc.identifier.citationReferencia BibliográficaJournal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy, 30(1), 13 p.
dc.identifier.issnISSN1066-9817
dc.identifier.uriURLhttp://repositorio.udla.cl/xmlui/handle/udla/1651
dc.identifier.uriURLhttps://www.tandfonline.com/toc/yjmt20/current
dc.description.abstractResumenObjective: To determine the effectiveness of manual therapy (MT) for functional outcomes in patients with distal radius fracture (DRF). Methods: An electronic search was performed in the Medline, Central, Embase, PEDro, Lilacs, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases. The eligibility criteria for selecting studies included randomized clinical trials that included MT techniques with or without other therapeutic interventions in functional outcomes, such as wrist or upper limb function, pain, grip strength, and wrist range of motion in patients older than 18 years with DRF. Results: Eight clinical trials met the eligibility criteria; for the quantitative synthesis, six studies were included. For supervised physiotherapy plus joint mobilization versus home exercise program at 6 weeks follow-up, the mean difference (MD) for wrist flexion was 7.1 degrees (p = 0.20), and extension was 11.99 degrees (p = 0.16). For exercise program plus mobilization with movement versus exercise program at 12 weeks follow-up, the PRWE was −10.2 points (p = 0.02), the DASH was −9.86 points (p = 0.0001), and grip strength was 3.9 percent (p = 0.25). For conventional treatment plus manual lymph drainage versus conventional treatment, for edema the MD at 3–7 days was −14.58 ml (p = 0.03), at 17–21 days −17.96 ml (p = 0.009), at 33–42 days −15.34 ml (p = 0.003), and at 63–68 days −13.97 ml (p = 0.002). Conclusion: There was very low to high evidence according to the GRADE rating. Adding mobilization with movement and manual lymphatic drainage showed statistically significant differences in wrist, upper limb function, and hand edema in patients with DRF.
dc.format.extentdc.format.extent13 páginas
dc.format.extentdc.format.extent6.288Mb
dc.format.mimetypedc.format.mimetypePDF
dc.language.isoLenguaje ISOeng
dc.publisherEditorTaylor and Francis
dc.sourceFuentesJournal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy
dc.subjectPalabras ClavesFracturas del radio distal
dc.subjectPalabras ClavesFunctional outcomes
dc.subjectPalabras ClavesManual therapy
dc.subject.lcshdc.subject.lcshMeta-análisis
dc.subject.meshdc.subject.meshRandomized controlled trial
dc.titleTítuloEffectiveness of manual therapy in patients with distal radius fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.typeTipo de DocumentoArtículo
dc.udla.catalogadordc.udla.catalogadorCBM
dc.udla.indexdc.udla.indexWoS
dc.udla.indexdc.udla.indexEmerging Sources Citation Index
dc.udla.indexdc.udla.indexScopus
dc.udla.indexdc.udla.indexAcademic Search Ultimate
dc.udla.indexdc.udla.indexCINAHL
dc.udla.indexdc.udla.indexEMBASE
dc.udla.indexdc.udla.indexMEDLINE
dc.identifier.doidc.identifier.doi10.1080/10669817.2021.1992090
dc.facultaddc.facultadFacultad de Salud y Ciencias Sociales


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem