Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAuthorLuraschi R.
dc.contributor.authorAuthorBarrera-Avalos C.
dc.contributor.authorAuthorVallejos-Vidal E.
dc.contributor.authorAuthorAlarcón J.
dc.contributor.authorAuthorMella-Torres A.
dc.contributor.authorAuthorHernández F.
dc.contributor.authorAuthorInostroza-Molina A.
dc.contributor.authorAuthorValdés D.
dc.contributor.authorAuthorImarai M.
dc.contributor.authorAuthorAcuña-Castillo C.
dc.contributor.authorAuthorReyes-López F.E.
dc.contributor.authorAuthorSandino A.M.
dc.contributor.otherCareerFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Agronomía
dc.date.accessionedDate Accessioned2024-09-03T19:19:22Z
dc.date.availableDate Available2024-09-03T19:19:22Z
dc.date.issuedDate Issued2022
dc.identifier.uriURIhttp://repositorio.udla.cl/xmlui/handle/udla/1460
dc.sourceSourcesCanadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
dc.titleTitleThe Comparative Analysis of Two RT-qPCR Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Reveals a Higher Risk of False-Negative Diagnosis in Samples with High Quantification Cycles for Viral and Internal Genes
dc.typeDocument TypeArtículo
dc.identifier.doidc.identifier.doi10.1155/2022/2594564


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record